Joint replacement · knee

Unicompartmental knee replacement

A unicompartmental knee replacement resurfaces only the worn compartment—most often the medial compartment—while preserving healthy compartments and functioning ligaments.

Correct indication

When it may be appropriate

acceptable cartilage in the opposite compartment and no uncontrolled active inflammatory arthropathy.

  • advanced symptomatic osteoarthritis predominantly confined to one tibiofemoral compartment
  • pain that matches that compartment despite appropriate non-operative treatment
  • functioning ligaments, a correctable deformity and adequate range of movement

Assessment

Imaging must confirm the pattern of wear

Weight-bearing radiographs are required, including views that assess the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments and overall limb alignment. MRI does not replace these radiographs and is not routinely required in every case.

Anterior knee pain or patellofemoral change does not automatically rule out the operation. Severity, location and clinical correlation matter more than the mere presence of an imaging abnormality.

Potential advantages

What is preserved compared with total replacement

potentially less blood loss and tissue disruption.

  • a smaller exposure, preservation of unaffected compartments and retained functional cruciate ligaments
  • joint behaviour that may feel closer to the native knee and an often faster early recovery

Limitations

Why selection is crucial

Total knee replacement may be more appropriate when osteoarthritis is multicompartmental, deformity is fixed or the knee is unstable. After partial replacement, arthritis can progress elsewhere and the implant may loosen or require revision.

The decision is not based on age or body weight alone. Wear pattern, anatomy, activity level and expectations are central.

Alternatives

Total replacement and osteotomy answer different problems

Total knee replacement addresses disease affecting several compartments. Osteotomy redistributes load without replacing the joint and may suit an active patient with malalignment and a well-preserved opposite compartment.

The options should be compared using weight-bearing radiographs and a clinical assessment, not a single MRI image.

Recovery

Early mobilisation with criterion-based progression

Weight bearing is often allowed early with crutches when fixation and the clinical situation permit. Initial priorities are pain and swelling control, full extension, quadriceps activation and safe gait.

Low-impact activity is resumed progressively. Wound care, thromboprophylaxis, driving and work advice remain individual.

Correct positioning

Before UKA, assess whether osteotomy can preserve the native knee

Unicompartmental replacement treats a severely damaged joint surface within one compartment. Osteotomy treats abnormal load distribution caused by alignment and is often preferable when an active patient still has recoverable cartilage. Weight-bearing radiographs, whole-limb alignment, deformity location, stability and the condition of every compartment determine the choice.

ACL deficiency does not automatically rule out every UKA, but stability requires rigorous assessment; selected cases may need associated ligament reconstruction. Multicompartmental arthritis or a non-correctable deformity more often favours total knee replacement.

Editorial responsibility

Medically reviewed content

Dr Răzvan Anițaș · Consultant orthopaedic and trauma surgeon, PhD · Last updated: 26 August 2026

Clinical reference sources

First step

Assessment, diagnosis and an individual plan

This information is educational and does not replace a consultation. The indication, restrictions and pace of rehabilitation depend on the examination, imaging and the exact procedure performed.