Arthroscopy · knee

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Replaces the torn ligament with a graft to control instability and protect the meniscus and cartilage during pivoting activities.

General guidance

When it may be considered

  • recurrent episodes of the knee giving way
  • sports involving pivoting and rapid changes of direction
  • repairable associated injuries
  • persistent instability despite rehabilitation

Individual decision

How suitability is determined

Whether surgery is appropriate depends on activity level, clinical instability, individual anatomy and any associated meniscal, cartilage or ligament injuries. Graft choice and anatomical tunnel placement are discussed as part of the surgical plan.

An abnormal scan alone is not an indication for surgery. The symptoms, clinical examination, progression and the patient's goals must be considered together.

Surgical plan

Decisions that tailor the procedure

  • functional instability and activity goals
  • meniscal and cartilage injuries that need to be protected or treated
  • graft choice and anatomical positioning of the bone tunnels
  • rehabilitation and return-to-sport criteria

Alternatives

What is discussed before surgery

The main alternative is a structured rehabilitation programme, with modification of pivoting activities and, in selected cases, a functional brace. Injections cannot restore the ACL or treat mechanical instability.

Read about conservative treatment

Before the procedure

Preparation and safety

  • before surgery, the knee should regain full extension, swelling should be controlled and strength restored;
  • discuss the choice of graft and the implications of the donor site;
  • tell the medical team about diabetes, anticoagulant treatment, allergies, smoking and any active infection;
  • do not stop or change long-term medication without instructions from the medical team;

After the procedure

Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation is staged and addresses neuromuscular control, strength and mobility, with functional criteria that must be met before returning to sport.

The exact protocol, permitted weight-bearing and follow-up schedule depend on the procedure performed and individual progress.

Informed consent

Risks and limitations

Possible complications include stiffness, infection, thromboembolism, graft failure, associated injuries and the need for revision surgery.

No procedure can guarantee complete pain relief or a return to a particular level of activity.

After surgery

Signs that require prompt medical assessment

  • fever, discharge, spreading redness or worsening pain at the wound;
  • sudden swelling of the calf, chest pain or difficulty breathing;
  • uncontrolled pain, new numbness, or a change in the colour or temperature of the limb.

For severe symptoms or an emergency, call 112. The instructions given to you at discharge take priority over the general information on this page.

In detail

Graft choice and rotational control

Autograft or allograft

Autograft is generally preferred in young or active patients because allograft carries a higher failure risk in this group. Allograft remains a selective option rather than an automatically equivalent substitute.

Bone–patellar tendon–bone

It provides bone-to-bone fixation and a low failure risk in some active populations, with a greater risk of anterior or kneeling pain.

Hamstring tendons

These reduce anterior harvest-site morbidity, but graft diameter and the individual risk profile matter; hamstring strength recovery and rotational control need attention.

Quadriceps tendon

This provides a robust graft with or without a bone block. Selection considers anatomy, sport, previous graft harvest and operative experience.

LET / ALL reconstruction

A lateral extra-articular procedure is not required for everyone. It is considered particularly in a young active patient with high-grade pivot shift, generalised laxity/hyperextension, pivoting sport, increased tibial slope or revision surgery. LET usually uses an iliotibial-band strip; ALL reconstruction anatomically restores the anterolateral ligament.

Primary ACL and revision surgery

Alignment, tibial slope and meniscal deficiency may determine strategy

Why did the graft fail?

ACL revision is not simply graft replacement. Planning assesses tunnel position and widening, fixation, infection, anterolateral or posterolateral instability, meniscal injury, cartilage, coronal alignment and posterior tibial slope.

When osteotomy is considered

Varus with medial-compartment overload, relevant valgus or excessive posterior tibial slope may increase ACL graft loading. In selected cases, HTO/DFO or slope-reducing osteotomy may be performed concurrently or in stages, particularly during revision surgery.

LET/ALL does not correct alignment

LET or ALL reconstruction may improve rotational control in a high-risk patient, a high-grade pivot shift or revision setting, but it does not replace correction of significant bony deformity or treatment of important meniscal deficiency.

Editorial responsibility

Medically reviewed content

Dr. Răzvan Anițaș
Consultant orthopaedic and trauma surgeon; PhD in medical sciences
Last editorial update: 22 August 2026

Professional background

Medical sources used for patient information

First step

Consultation, diagnosis and an individual treatment recommendation

This information does not replace a consultation. Surgery is recommended only after the individual benefits, alternatives and risks have been assessed.